‘What
is Mathematics, Really?’ is a book by Reuben Hersh which focuses on discussing
the different point of views of many philosophers of mathematics. Some topics discussed
in the book are about Formalism, Platonism, Constructivism, Humanism and
others. He tries to debunk the first three and try to introduce what he
believes in which is Humanism.
For
formalists, mathematics for them is a meaningless game. Because of this, there
are not much mathematicians that support formalism. Platonism is much more
popular than formalism. Platonists believe that mathematical truth are not
invented but discovered. For constructivism, they believe that proof is
important to validate that a certain thing exists. An example given is the 4-dimensional
cube. Hersh says that these three are just some philosophies of mathematics.
What he believes in is “Humanism”. He believes that “mathematics must be
understood as a human activity, a social phenomenon, part of human culture,
historically evolved, and intelligible only in a social context.”
A
part of the book that was interesting for me was about mathematics having a
front and a back. What is taught in class is only the front while the back is
rarely spoken or just forgotten. What’s taught in class is the “finish product”
of what mathematicians have discovered or proved. I thought of all the math
classes I had since elementary days and I realized that what he said was true.
Honestly,
this book was very hard for me to digest. Every time I tried to read the book,
I had to open the dictionary application in my phone. It exercised my brain to
think more and understand it better but it was still hard. When reading this
book, a person must have enough background about mathematics and philosophy to
understand it better. This book aims to explain the content in an easy
comprehensible way for everyone, but I think Hersh has failed in this objective.
All in all, it was a good book. Hersh tried to explain everything in a modern
and fun way. I just hope he could have explained everything better and in a
more direct way.
it is true that most students are contented with what is taught to them in class without bothering how it was discovered (i am guilty lol). i also agree that the book was a bit difficult to understand. Hersh was able to express his love for math through the book and tried to share it with everyone.. but i guess we weren't affected? hahaha jk
ReplyDeleteyeah, i agree its really hard to understand, but looking at the bright side, we were still able to learn something new. indeed it was a good book :).
ReplyDeletenice one gayle! haha
yeah, i agree its really hard to understand, but looking at the bright side, we were still able to learn something new. indeed it was a good book :).
ReplyDeletenice one gayle! haha
I like how you emphasized the author's idea of math having two phases, front and back. After reading that part, it made me realize too and eventually agree with him.
ReplyDeleteyou did a great job in making the review. your stated your observations straight to the point. I agree with you in the interesting part of the book, mentioning about the front and back of mathematics. :)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete