A book by
Reuben Hersh. The author approaches the definition of mathematics in a
different perspective. Well, he’s not just looking for the definition but
rather what is mathematics really about? Is it an arbitrary concept developed
by man? Or is it a branch of study that’s simply a socio-historical
construction and is shared by all who understand it? Or is it a static nature
of the universe that isn’t discovered but rather used by man for different
purpose?
Whatever it is, the author
tackled what is mathematics in a philosophical way of view. The book is
mind-bending and thought provoking that when you read every paragraph you take
time to digest it before you could move on to the next. The author proposes
three basic philosophies, namely: Platonism, Formalism and Constructivism. He
takes time to define each and every one of them, relate them to their practical
use and relate them to mathematics. Cautiously going through every aspect and
avoiding biases to achieve his point, he uses surveys, asked questions on
mathematicians and philosophers and even put them into context on how the
reader could understand it better. He argued that wether math could be a
physical or mental manifestation of the universe. He justified that math is the
answer and nothing more; there is no other answer but the final answer which
has been justified by historical figures through years of extensive research
and problem solving. He said that math is trying to explain what the universe
is creating or destroying.
He assumed that math is an indestructible force that is as solid as a
rock, since socio-historical figures suggest that it has been both tested and
failed and succeeded in previous learning’s. But he suggests that math could
just be merely and illusion that was formed by man to simple solve problems and
nothing more. But different philosophers said otherwise that its an abstract
concept that lives beyond our earthly realm. Although these points have been
made, Hersh made his argument direct and clear, the book is rather more on the
tour of philosophical journey rather than mathematics itself.
A philosophical journey, indeed. But I must ask, what is your stand about the author's humanist philosophy of math?
ReplyDelete